The Mildura Weir (or Lock 11) Denil Fishway was established under the Murray-Darling Basin Authority's 'Sea to Hume Dam' program around 2013 to facilitate both upstream and downstream passage of medium to large-sized fish species (like Murray Cod or Gold and Silver Perch) in this region.
Between 2020 to 2023 investigatory works were conducted with concept designs for short-term improvements to fish passage at the site.
This case study will examine the hydraulics at the entrance of this fishway, focusing on the base case (2013 design) and short-term concept plans (design case). Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) with the software package FLOW3D was undertaken for this. CFD modelling of the fishway was undertaken in accordance with practical best practices.
Special thanks to Steven Slarke of Jacobs, Ivor Stuart of CSU and the Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder (CEWH) for the site footage provided below and support of this case study.
The fishway, positioned at the left abutment of the weir, is built on a sloped concrete apron and flat apron slab. The fishway is constructed separately from the weir allowing for complete removal from the river during flood events or sectional dismantling during different operational periods.
This flexibility in design allows for cost-effective interventions to increase fish migrations with the denil design selected due to site constraints, ease of dismantlement and ability to pass larger fish species in the catchment.
The base case (2013 design) denil fishway included an entrance shield to deflect high velocities and turbulence from the weir, and aid in fish attraction. The short term concept plan that was modelled for this CFD study included increasing the depth of the shield to provide a seal with the apron slab, and additional denil panels at the entrance.
A coarse cell CFD model was initially developed to assess the following:
- Flow regimes at the entrance to the fishway (velocities, eddies, air entrainment)
- Differences in regimes between the two cases
Cell sizes were varied and tested until cell size convergence was observed.
To assess the impacts of turbulence without averaging of the Navier-Stokes equations, the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) turbulence model was selected.
Initial modelling, as shown in the video, demonstrates for the base case the gap between the shield and apron created a high velocity zone at the entrance.
A comparison of surface velocities suggests in the base case, the high velocities under the shield approach the surface near the entrance (a vertical roller). For this operating condition, it would likely problematic for smaller bodied aussie fish approaching the entrance.
Extending the shield to the apron slab seems to significantly reduce eddies and velocities at the fishway entrance and eliminates the vertical roller at the entrance.
Modelling of air entrainment (multiphase mixing of air and water) provides valuable insight into turbulent zones near the fishway and "white water" which can provide hinderance to fishway entrance attraction. Similarly, to the previous velocity outputs, the reduction in air entrainment at the entrance for the design case is notable.
Finer mesh scenarios at the denil entrance ramp were modelled to better estimate eddies and velocity gradients through the ramp.
The additional denil plates toward the entrance of the fishway on average seem to have reduced velocities through the ramp. Interestingly it was found at the top of the ramp high velocities seem to contract and "stick" to the surface before rolling through the remaining plates.
Reducing the tailwater at the fishway to the minimum operating level for fish passage shows a notable increase in velocities through the entrance ramp. But in this instance, the design case seems to perform better.
Initial coarse modelling of the entrance ramp and weir for entrance attraction found the updated design performed significantly better than the 2013 design. This improvement was measured by the following:
Finer modelling of the entrance ramp in isolation found the additional denil plates reduced velocities on average through the ramp. Interestingly, the high velocity (streaming flow) at the top of the ramp remained for both designs. This high velocity may be a function of the slope of the ramp but more modelling would be required to confirm this.
For a shallower tailwater condition, velocities were found to increase for both designs with the short-term concept plans performing better than the previous (2013) design.
A comparison of model results against site footage for both designs was conducted with the CFD model replicating observations quite well. As shown in the image, the following was observed (from top to bottom):
Regardless of what the modelling is showing, success is measured in practice. How these new velocities and eddies translate to fish passage through the structure is still to be determined, we look forward to seeing monitoring results for the next migratory season.
Learn more about aussie fish and fishway design here (warning, 2hr webinar): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKiyvamiy70&t=373s
Learn more about CFD for fishway design below:
Copyright © 2023 Forward Hydro Pty Ltd - All Rights Reserved.
We use cookies to analyse website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.